Biktjorn v. Bendiksen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that federal courts use Title VII standards to judge discrimination and retaliation claims brought under MFEPA
• noting that federal courts use Title VII standards to judge discrimination and retaliation claims brought under MFEPA
• explaining that “the analysis under Article 24 is, for all intents and purposes, duplicative of the analysis under the Fourteenth Amendment”
• “The movant satisfies the good cause requirement by showing that, despite diligence, the proposed claims could not have been reasonably brought in a timely manner.”
• stating and applying two-part test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).