Bigwood v. United States Agency for International Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “a person avoiding harm to his life or liberty has a clear interest in the withholding” of information that would identify him publicly (quotation omitted)
• holding that, in the unusual case where “organizations whose identities have been withheld are very small[,]” disclosing information about the organizations is tantamount to disclosing information ab out individuals
• applying Exemption 6 to identifying information where it created a risk of physical danger to the individual
• finding the same where the interest at issue was avoiding harm to life or liberty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).