Skip to main content
· 3/4/1965

Bignold v. King County

Citations

  • 399 P.2d 611
  • 65 Wash. 2d 817
  • 1965 Wash. LEXIS 775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding quantum meruit award in favor of contractor, even when strictly proper notice was not given, when conduct of the county required contractor to perform extra work
  • rejecting the argument that the contractor had a duty to comply with the strict terms of the contract despite effectively contrary direction from the county engineer and imposing \resolute good faith\ on the county to abide by the direction of its agents
  • rejecting the argument that the contractor had a duty to comply with the strict terms of the contract despite effectively contrary direction from the county engineer and imposing “resolute good faith” on the county to abide by the direction of its agents
  • whether contractor should have discovered or anticipated presence of wet subsurface and large boulders a question of fact
  • order to halt construction of public road was affirmative act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.