Bigman v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an arrest made outside an officer's jurisdiction, absent exigent circumstances, violates the Fourth Amendment
• finding that an officer's subjective belief regarding the validity of an arrest under state law only applies to a qualified immunity defense
• sheriffs testimony that he believed arrests in Indian territory were legal presented question of fact whether county had custom or policy regarding such arrests
• arrest executed outside of the officer’s jurisdiction violated the Fourth Amendment; absent exigent circumstances, such an arrest is presumptively unreasonable
• \There is no question but that 18 U.S.C. § 13 would allow federal enforcement of the local ordinance against public intoxication involved in this case.\
• a “warrantless arrest executed outside of the arresting officer’s jurisdiction [that is, on tribal land] is analogous to a warrantless arrest without probable cause” and is “presumptively unreasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).