Skip to main content
· 10/27/1906

Biglow v. Conradt

Citations

  • 3 Alaska 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “As the first runner-up, [the plaintiff] has a ‘direct economic interest’ in the award of the [contract] and, therefore, is an ‘interested party.’”
  • agency need not identify each element intrinsic to an announced evaluation factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wickersham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.