Biggs v. Vail

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the trial court erred in awarding fees because only three of the four claims for relief were found to be frivolous
• if statutory meaning is clear from plain and unambiguous language, that meaning must be accepted by the court
• if statutory meaning is clear from plain and unambiguous language, that meaning must be accepted by the court
• if there is ambiguity, extrinsic aids, such as legislative history, may be used to determine legislative intent
• if there is ambiguity, extrinsic aids, such as legislative history, may be used to determine legislative intent
• if there is ambiguity, extrinsic aids, such as legislative history, may be used to determine legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).