Skip to main content
· 2/25/1998

Biggs v. Stovin (In Re Luz International, Ltd.)

Citations

  • 219 B.R. 837
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 3497
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2457
  • 39 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1332
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that a claim as a right to payment “encompass[es] virtually any type of obligation reducible to some monetary equivalence”
  • applying de novo review in a setoff case because “when the facts are established and the rule of law is undisputed, whether the facts satisfy the legal rule is a mixed question of law and fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Hagan, Tchaikovsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.