Biggs v. Feinberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To so hold would amount to compelling the states to adopt each and every more generous classification which, on its face, is not irrational”
• “To so hold would amount to compelling the states to adopt each and every more generous classification which, on its face, is not irrational.”
• “To so hold would amount to compelling the states to adopt each and every more generous classification which, on its face, is not irrational.”
• “The defendants respond by asserting that it is not necessary to make such a showing [under strict scrutiny] because California has merely adopted a federal classification which is subject only to the rational basis standard of review”
• with respect to asylum applicants who enter or remain in the United States illegally and then apply for asylum, “[t]heir presence is tolerated during the period necessary to process their applications” but “it has not been legitimated by any affirmative act”
• federal classifications valid unless wholly irrational

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).