Biggerstaff v. Federal Communications Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff had demonstrated standing based on his experience that it is “definitely likely” that the challenged agency order will be applied to him
• holding that the plaintiff had demonstrated standing based on his experience that it is “definitely likely” that the challenged agency order will be applied to him
• “[A] prediction of injury based on experience suffices to show injury in fact to the extent that past wrongs are evidence bearing on whether there is a real and immediate threat of repeated injury.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).