Biggers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the doctrine of si- leged communication does not extend to physician and patient
• the doctrine of privileged communication does not extend to physician and patient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Biggers
  Texas Supreme Court· 1962-10-03· cited 56×
• State Highway Commission v. Earl
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1966-06-02· cited 27×
• Chance v. Chance
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1995-10-26· cited 23×
• Boyles v. Houston Lighting and Power Company
  Texas Supreme Court· 1971-03-03· cited 15×
• City of Austin v. Capitol Livestock Auction Co.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1968-11-06· cited 8×
• Holloway v. County of Matagorda
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1984-02-23· cited 7×
• State v. Ashworth
  Texas Supreme Court· 1972-07-12· cited 6×
• Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Boyles
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1970-04-04· cited 3×
• Opinion No.
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1985-08-05
• Opinion No.
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1977-10-12
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1985-07-02
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1977-07-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. Philadelphia
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1918-10-23· cited 72×
• City of Houston v. Autrey
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1961-11-22· cited 7×
• Caddo Grocery & Ice v. Carpenter
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1955-12-14· cited 4×
• Mrs. Ewell Dean Coward Kennelley v. Travelers Insurance Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1960-03-03· cited 3×