Big Sky Colony, Inc. v. Mont. Dep't of Labor & Indus.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding claims of fraud in sentencing court and on direct appeal necessarily attacked the state court judgment and were second or successive
• construing the petitioner’s 60(b) motion as a second or successive motion because he alleged fraud committed in his sentencing and direct appeal courts, not fraud on the habeas court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).