Big Sandy Ry. Co. v. Dils

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding such duty where plaintiff specifically 12 requested defendant to preserve all relevant evidence and defendant indicated its intent 13 to comply
• denying sealing of “detailed discussion” of “field and 12 laboratory protocols,” but sealing emails discussing “costs and pricing practices that are not 13 generally known to [plaintiff’s] customers and competitors”
• injunction granted in favor of disabled member of the 12 public requiring remote access to legislative hearings and committee meetings
• “[I]t is not enough for a plaintiff to show that he opposed garden-variety unfairness or harsh treatment in the workplace; he is only protected from retaliation if the practice he opposed or complained about is specifically prohibited by Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).