Skip to main content
· 2/6/1933

Big Rock Stone & Material Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Citations

  • 186 Ark. 905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that service pursuant to nonresident-motorist statute was in derogation of the common law and, thus, required strict compliance
  • trial court did not err in granting defendant summary judgment based on lack of service where plaintiffs served action by regular mail and applicable statute required service by registered or certified mail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Humphreys

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.