Big Ridge, Inc. v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing privacy protection for medical records in the context of the Fourth Amendment
• discussing privacy protection for medical records in the context of the Fourth Amendment
• “Absent extraordinary circumstances, it would be a violation of . . . privacy if the records were revealed beyond the agency, [because such] medical or personnel information would not advance public transparency of the [agency’s] operations”
• “MSHA designates a mine as having a ‘pattern of violations’ (‘POV’
• prioritizing substance over form in Fourth Amendment analysis
• prioritizing substance over form in Fourth Amendment analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).