Big Brother/Big Sister of Metro Atlanta, Inc. v. Terrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sexual moles tation not within the scope of employment and did not further employer’s business; hence, no liability under respondeat superior
• sexual molestation not within the scope of employment and did not further employer's business; hence, no liability under respondeat superior
• actions of servant not in furtherance of the master’s business where servant abandons master’s business and pursues own sexual desires
• sexual molestation not within the scope of employment and did not further employer’s business; hence, no liability under respondeat superior
• no liability for sexual abuse of child by volunteer noting that “[w]hile Hendricks may have been advancing Big Brother’s interest by spending time with Sheridan, he clearly abandoned Big Brother’s interest and pursued only his own when he sodomized the child”
• no liability for sexual abuse of child by volunteer noting that “[w]hile Hendricks may have been advancing Big Brother’s interest by spending time with Sheridan, he clearly abandoned Big Brother’s interest and pursued only his own when he sodomized the child”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).