Skip to main content
· 5/1/2003

Bieregu v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 259 F. Supp. 2d 342
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7273
  • 2003 WL 1989661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the “[FTCA was] Plaintiff’s sole remedy with respect to the claims asserted against [federal defendants] in their official capacities.”
  • holding that VCCR does not create duty enforceable in tort
  • “Plaintiff does not allege that he has exhausted his administrative remedies. Thus, Plaintiff cannot pursue a claim under the FTCA”
  • “[W]ith respect to Plaintiff's claims against Defendants in their official capacities, all courts that have addressed the issue agree that the ATCA does not itself waive the sovereign immunity of the United States.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debevoise

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.