Bier v. Pennsylvania R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the “volume of requested documents [was] not unreasonable in light of” the lengthy complaint and allegations of multibillion-dollar harm
• concluding plaintiffs satisfied the particularly requirement because their motion “describes a ‘clearly defined universe of documents,’ and the burden of producing the materials should be slight, considering that the defendants have previously produced them to other entities”
• granting motion to lift PSLRA discovery stay as to a defendant who was divesting assets
• finding particularity in a request 3 describing a “clearly defined universe of documents” produced to governmental, 4 regulatory, or self-regulatory agencies
• “[A] request for documents previously produced in connection with internal and external investigations is particularized within the meaning of the PSLRA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).