Bienvenido Arocho v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that responses of a VE are relevant only to the extent offered in response to hypothetical questions that correspond to the medical evidence of record
• holding that responses of a VE are relevant only to the extent offered in response to hypothetical questions that correspond to the medical evidence of record
• stating that a vocational expert's answer to a hypothetical corresponding to plaintiff’s RFC may constitute substantial evidence
• explaining that “for a vocational expert's answer to a hypothetical question to be relevant, the inputs into that hypothetical must correspond to conclusions that are supported by the outputs from the medical authorities”
• stating vocational expert's answer to hypothetical may constitute substantial evidence only if hypothetical corresponds to plaintiff’s RFC
• reguiring ALJ to frame the hypothetical guestion to correspond to the medical conclusions so the vocational expert's answer is relevant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).