Bieman v. Thurn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing admission of expert testimony where witness relied on another expert’s opinions, without independently verifying them
• finding lay witness improperly offered expert opinion and remanding for a new trial
• “[W]e likewise do not conclude that an expert may not rely on another expert’s (or a lay witness’s) admissible testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).