Oregon Supreme Court· 2/22/1978
Biegler v. Kirby
Citations
- 574 P.2d 1127
- 281 Or. 423
- 1978 Ore. LEXIS 762
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding trial court’s ruling because the trial court was not required to sort out admissible from inadmissible evidence
- determination of how to allot argument between two attorneys arguing on behalf of one party is within discretion of trial court
- trial court not obligated to sift out admissible evidence from inadmissible evidence when objecting party fails to do so
- “The conduct of trial is within the discretion of the trial court and an appellate court will not interfere absent an abuse of discretion.”
- “The conduct of trial is within the discretion of the trial court and an appellate court will not interfere absent an abuse of discretion.”
- where jury in personal injury action initially returned verdict for plaintiff but assessed no general and special damages, trial court did not abuse discretion in resubmitting the case to the jury for further redeliberation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tempore, Denecke, Tongue, Linde, Richardson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
- State v. SperouOregon Supreme Court· 2019-06-06· cited 120×
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Montgomery Ward Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-05-21· cited 16×
- Jones v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-11-17· cited 9×
- Meislahn v. DemorestCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-10-06· cited 8×
- Davis v. Pacific Diesel Power Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-08-20· cited 8×
- Calvert v. OurumCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-06-11· cited 8×
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-08· cited 6×
- D.C. Thompson & Co. v. HaugeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-02-06· cited 3×
- Robin v. KnuthCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-07-24· cited 2×
- State v. McBeanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-20· cited 1×
- Lycette v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-08
- State v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-01-26
- McCoy v. PopmaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-30
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court· 1954-06-17· cited 60×
- Snyder v. Portland Railway, Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1923-06-05· cited 23×
- Moore v. DrennanOregon Supreme Court· 1974-07-05· cited 21×
- Lewis v. Devils Lake Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-02-20· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. Amore v. WilkinsonOregon Supreme Court· 1957-09-25· cited 9×
- Hickman v. HAUGHTON ELEVATOR COMPANYOregon Supreme Court· 1974-03-07· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.