Skip to main content
· 2/22/1978

Biegler v. Kirby

Citations

  • 574 P.2d 1127
  • 281 Or. 423
  • 1978 Ore. LEXIS 762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding trial court’s ruling because the trial court was not required to sort out admissible from inadmissible evidence
  • determination of how to allot argument between two attorneys arguing on behalf of one party is within discretion of trial court
  • trial court not obligated to sift out admissible evidence from inadmissible evidence when objecting party fails to do so
  • “The conduct of trial is within the discretion of the trial court and an appellate court will not interfere absent an abuse of discretion.”
  • “The conduct of trial is within the discretion of the trial court and an appellate court will not interfere absent an abuse of discretion.”
  • where jury in personal injury action initially returned verdict for plaintiff but assessed no general and special damages, trial court did not abuse discretion in resubmitting the case to the jury for further redeliberation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tempore, Denecke, Tongue, Linde, Richardson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.