Biegel v. Gangemi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• robbery of victim’s jewelry, “in exactly the same place,” on the same date, and “just a matter of seconds” after robbery of another victim’s money and eyeglasses, constituted a single criminal transaction
• “In order to determine whether or not two' acts are part of the same criminal transaction, the court must look at the nature of the crime, as well as the underlying facts (i.e., victim, time, place and date).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).