Skip to main content
· 7/13/1995

Bieder v. United States

Citations

  • 662 A.2d 185
  • 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 142
  • 1995 WL 415260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that plaintiff failed to argue that a wholly owned subsidiary’s office was the parent’s office under an agency theory
  • holding a job posting asking that candidates live in New Jersey or be within driving distance was not sufficient to establish REPB in New Jersey
  • finding venue improper where defendant’s employ- ees chose to rent storage lockers to store defendant’s prod- uct samples with no evidence that defendant “established or ratified” said lockers
  • finding insufficient conclusory allegations that defendants “work in concert with respect to the regulatory approval, manufacturing, marketing, sale, and distribution of generic pharmaceutical products” and collectively “filed [the] ANDA” at issue
  • finding insufficient conclusory allegations that defendants “work in concert with respect to the regulatory approval, manufacturing, marketing, sale, and distribution of generic pharmaceutical products” and collectively “filed [the] ANDA” at issue
  • “[I]t might be that a parent corporation might specifically ratify a subsidiary’s place of business, even if the two do maintain corporate separateness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Belson, Ruiz, Schwelb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.