Skip to main content
· 3/14/1905

Bieber v. Kutztown Borough

Citations

  • 27 Pa. Super. 436
  • 1905 Pa. Super. LEXIS 80

Syllabus

<p>Road law — Widening street — Change of center line — Evidence—Ordinance —Borough.</p> <p>Where a borough ordinance widening a street is so vague in its language as to leave it uncertain whether the center line of the street was changed or not, but the evidence shows that the borough and its officials, and viewers appointed in damage proceedings, considered the line as unchanged and acted on that supposition, a finding by the court below that the line was in fact unchanged will not be reversed by the appellate court.</p>

Judges: Bison, Hendekson, Mob, Mobbison, Oblady, Pobteb, Rice, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.