· 4/7/2010
Bid for Position, LLC v. AOL, LLC
Citations
- 601 F.3d 1311
- 94 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1368
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7163
- 2010 WL 1337733
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “bid” and “value of the bid” to have the same meaning because the claim language and specification used the terms interchangeably
- holding “bid” and “value of the bid” to have the same meaning because the claim language and specification used the terms inter- changeably
- holding “bid” and “value of the bid” to have the same meaning because the claim language and specification used the terms inter- changeably
- explaining that “it is the comparison of the bids (i.e., the bid amounts submitted by the bidders) that determines the position of priority”
- stating that Konia “builds on prior art involving continuous auctions for priority placement in internet search results”
- construing “bid” and “value of the bid” identically because the claim used the terms interchangeably
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Bryson, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.