Skip to main content
· 4/7/2010

Bid for Position, LLC v. AOL, LLC

Citations

  • 601 F.3d 1311
  • 94 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1368
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7163
  • 2010 WL 1337733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “bid” and “value of the bid” to have the same meaning because the claim language and specification used the terms interchangeably
  • holding “bid” and “value of the bid” to have the same meaning because the claim language and specification used the terms inter- changeably
  • holding “bid” and “value of the bid” to have the same meaning because the claim language and specification used the terms inter- changeably
  • explaining that “it is the comparison of the bids (i.e., the bid amounts submitted by the bidders) that determines the position of priority”
  • stating that Konia “builds on prior art involving continuous auctions for priority placement in internet search results”
  • construing “bid” and “value of the bid” identically because the claim used the terms interchangeably

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Bryson, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.