Bicknell v. B & S ENTERPRISES

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing whether the seller provided goods that conformed to the contract when the contract contained an “as is” clause
• affirming car dealer’s motion for directed verdict when that dealer “did nothing to conceal the condition” of the car sold to plaintiff; “[gjiven the ease with which the plaintiff could have discovered the alleged nonconformance,” she had “no grounds to revoke her acceptance” of the car
• affirming car dealer’s motion for directed verdict when that dealer “did nothing to conceal the condition” of the car sold to plaintiff; “[g]iven the ease with which the plaintiff could have discovered the alleged nonconformance,” she had “no grounds to revoke her acceptance” of the car
• “[gjiven the ease with which the plaintiff could have discovered the alleged nonconfor-mance, . . . she had no grounds to revoke her acceptance of the automobile”
• buyer, with ample opportunity to inspect automobile to ascertain whether it conformed with description in bill of sale before she took possession of it and signed bill of sale and financing documents, had no subsequent right to reject automobile for nonconformance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).