Bickerstaff v. Patterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while loss of valuable business has been held to be sufficient to prove irreparable injury, in the plaintiffs ease it was not sufficient
• holding that a two-month delay created a “strong argument in favor of applying laches”
• stating that delay may be “considered in the multi-factored analysis of whether injunctive relief is warranted” or in “the application of equitable doctrines such as laches”
• stating that delay may be “considered in the multi-factored analysis of whether injunctive relief is warranted” or in “the application of equitable doctrines such as laches”
• stating that delay may be “considered in the multi-factored analysis of whether 11 injunctive relief is warranted” or in “the application of equitable doctrines such as laches”
• noting that undue delay may be- considered in the multi-factored injunctive analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).