Bickems v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding in-court identification to be insufficient, standing alone, after witness initially testified he “was sure appellant was the individual who robbed him” but later indicated he was “not that positive” about the perpetrator’s identity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).