Skip to main content
· 3/19/1991

Bickel v. Hansen

Citations

  • 819 P.2d 957
  • 169 Ariz. 371
  • 82 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 44
  • 1991 Ariz. App. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing an implied way of necessity from an implied easement of necessity
  • where an adequate alternative exists, “the statutory way of necessity does not exist because the purportedly landlocked land is not, in fact, hemmed in”
  • implied way of necessity is dependent on (1) unity of ownership of the dominant and ser-vient estates; (2) severance thereof; (3) no outlet for the dominant property; and (4) showing that reasonable necessity for access existed at the time of severance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carruth, Fernandez, Howard, James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.