· 3/19/1991
Bickel v. Hansen
Citations
- 819 P.2d 957
- 169 Ariz. 371
- 82 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 44
- 1991 Ariz. App. LEXIS 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing an implied way of necessity from an implied easement of necessity
- where an adequate alternative exists, “the statutory way of necessity does not exist because the purportedly landlocked land is not, in fact, hemmed in”
- implied way of necessity is dependent on (1) unity of ownership of the dominant and ser-vient estates; (2) severance thereof; (3) no outlet for the dominant property; and (4) showing that reasonable necessity for access existed at the time of severance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carruth, Fernandez, Howard, James
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.