Court of Appeals of Arizona· 3/30/1972
Bickel v. Bickel
Citations
- 495 P.2d 154
- 17 Ariz. App. 29
- 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 607
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Homestead exemption did not protect recovery of attorney's fees awarded as part of divorce decree awarding support.
- Homestead exemption did not protect recovery of attorney's fees awarded as part of divorce decree awarding support.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krucker, Hathaway, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Magee v. MageeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-08· cited 93×
- In the Matter of J. C. Catlow, Debtor. Lawrence J. Marks, Individually and on Behalf of Wendy Kay Hall v. J. C. CatlowNinth Circuit· 1981-12-14· cited 41×
- Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1994-11-29· cited 37×
- Marriage of Strong v. StrongMontana Supreme Court· 2000-07-06· cited 17×
- Breedlove v. BreedloveNevada Supreme Court· 1984-12-06· cited 11×
- White v. WhiteMontana Supreme Court· 1981-11-25· cited 8×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-06-20· cited 7×
- Bagalini v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-02-08· cited 6×
- Argonaut Insurance v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-12-06· cited 6×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.