Skip to main content
· 8/18/2005

Bic Pen Corp. v. Carter

Citations

  • 171 S.W.3d 657
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6622
  • 2005 WL 1982460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • not requiring expert testimony based on counsel’s concession but reviewing safety data intro- duced into evidence to determine whether products on market were reasonable alternative design that would have avoided injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hinojosa, Yañez, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.