Bible v. First National Bank of Rawlins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining a two-prong test where the work involved creates a risk of harm that cannot be eliminated with the exercise of reasonable care and that the risk of harm must be to the person
• repossession company was independent contractor where “how, when, who, and where” of the repossession were left to the discretion of the repossession company
• “Whether a special danger to others inherent in or normal to the work is present must of necessity be determined by the facts of each case.” (internal quotations omitted)
• “[I]n responding to a motion for summary judgment it is the duty of counsel to bring to the attention of the trial court those portions of the record (in the absence of controverting affidavits) which will support his position that a disputed issue of material fact exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).