Biberstine v. Woodworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an attorney’s negligent failure to properly schedule a client’s debt in a petition for bankruptcy became a viable malpractice claim at the time of discharge because the petition was amendable up until that point
• statute begins to run either from the termination of the attorney's services or from the discovery of the malpractice, whichever is later
• statute begins to run either from the termination of the attorney’s services or from the discovery of the malpractice, whichever is later
• malpractice action against attorney for failing to schedule debt in bankruptcy runs from date of plaintiff’s discharge in bankruptcy
• negligence arising out of delay or inaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).