Bibb County v. Monroe County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that once the Secretary resumed the process for resolving the boundary dispute, “either county would be entitled to seek mandamus again if the Secretary were then to act arbitrarily and capriciously in determining the true boundary line”
• restarting statutory boundary line dispute resolution process “from square one,” after substantial time and money were spent during the process already underway, was not an adequate alternative remedy
• restarting statutory boundary line dispute resolution process “from square one,” after substantial time and money were spent during the process already underway, was not an adequate alternative remedy
• one criteria for issuance of the writ of mandamus is that “no other adequate remedy is available to effectuate the relief sought”
• writ of mandamus proper if “the applicant has a clear legal right to such relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).