Skip to main content
· 6/16/1994

Biaza v. Simon

Citations

  • 879 S.W.2d 349
  • 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1447
  • 1994 WL 265156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that once the trial court initially grants a new trial motion, which is an interlocutory order, the trial court invests itself with full authority over the case until a final judgment is entered; thus, the court may at any time “ungrant” its previous grant of a new trial motion
  • reasoning that once the trial court initially grants a new trial motion, which is an interlocutory order, the trial court invests itself with full authority over the case until a final judgment is entered; thus, the court may at any time \ungrant\ its previous grant of a new trial motion
  • An unappealed Texas divorce judgment is not subject to a collateral attack in a subsequent suit.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Ellis, Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.