Bianco v. Hoehn (In Re Gaston & Snow)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the two ‘catchall’ provisions, § 157(b)(2)(A) and (0)” “must not be read too broadly,” lest they “obliterate the core/non-core distinction itself’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).