Bi Song Huang v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although the statutory exhaustion requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) does not apply to motions to reopen that are not remedies available “as of right,” exhaustion may be required as a prudential matter
• noting that “neither withholding nor deferral of removal prevents the government from removing an alien to a third country other than the country to which removal was withheld or deferred”
• “Congress passed the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act (the FARR Act) in 1998 to implement Article 3 of CAT.”
• “Congress passed the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act (the FARR Act) in 1998 to implement Article 3 of CAT.”
• “[N]either withholding nor deferral of removal prevents the government from removing an alien to a third country other than the country to which removal was withheld or deferred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).