· 5/1/1978
Bhongsupatana v. United States
Citations
- 435 U.S. 1008
- 98 S. Ct. 1880
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- investigator’s notes of interviews did not fall under the Jencks Act even if they may have contained “ ‘occasional verbatim recitations of phrases used by the person interviewed’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.