Bhatti v. Trustees of Boston University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer’s written reprimand, even if undeserved, was “not materially adverse and therefore not actionable” because there were no tangible consequences from the reprimand
• holding that “a criticism that carries with it no consequences is not materially adverse and therefore not actionable”
• holding that failure to provide performance review not adverse where plaintiff in any event received a pay raise
• holding that failure to provide performance review not adverse where plaintiff in any event received a pay raise
• concluding that plaintiff’s assertion “that she work longer hours” and management’s selective enforcement of workplace rules against her in the form of critical memoranda” were not adverse employment actions
• holding that reprimands with no tangible consequences were not \material\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).