Bhakta v. County of Maui

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[the supreme court] reviews the trial court’s [findings] under the clearly erroneous standard” (citing Ueoka v. Szymanski, 107 Hawai'i 386, 393, 114 P.3d 892, 899 (2005))
• stating that \[the supreme court] reviews the trial court's [findings] under the clearly erroneous standard\ (citing Ueoka v. Szymanski, 107 Hawai`i 386, 393, 114 P.3d 892, 899 (2005))
• noting a conclusion of law supported by findings of fact and reflecting \an application of the correct rule of law will not be overturned\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).