Skip to main content
· 1/11/1984

Bhagwan D. Raheja and Krishna K. Raheja v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 725 F.2d 64
  • 53 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 496
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Tax Court doesn’t generally look behind the notice of deficiency to examine the Commissioner’s motive or procedure; “[t]he rationale for this rule is that the Tax Court proceeding is de novo”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Coffey, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.