B.H. ex rel. E.D.E. v. R.E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that NHPA requires federal agencies only to survey properties that “may be affected by the project”
• refusing to extend “§ 7 (a)(2) protection, including the § 7(d) limitation” to all “vulnerable” species (emphasis added)
• finding no impermissible burden on religious rights despite Navajo and Hopi plaintiffs’ contentions that development of the Snow Bowl on the San Francisco Peaks (federal land
• government actions that merely offend or cast doubt on religious beliefs do not violate Free Exercise Clause
• “We are aware that subsequent legislative history is not controlling evidence of the intent underlying previously enacted legislation.”
• “Many government actions may offend religious believers, and may cast doubt upon the veracity of religious beliefs, but unless such actions penalize faith, they do not burden religion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).