Skip to main content
· 1/13/1986

Bezold v. United States

Citations

  • 474 U.S. 1063
  • 106 S. Ct. 811
  • 54 U.S.L.W. 3461
  • 88 L. Ed. 2d 786
  • 1986 U.S. LEXIS 2412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suit to obtain “mandatory injunctive relief in the form of certain remedial action and restitution for expenditures already incurred” is designed primarily to obtain monetary relief and is therefore inappropriate under Rule 23(b)(2)
  • granting conditional certification of class while noting problem of manageability
  • district court did not abuse its discretion in using a preinfringement, internal memorandum of projected profits to arrive at a reasonable royalty in part because the infringer “used the figures in the memorandum in deciding whether to manufacture and market the infringing device”
  • granting conditional certification of nationwide class

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.