Skip to main content
· 9/24/2010

Beyene v. Astrue

Citations

  • 739 F. Supp. 2d 77
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101617
  • 2010 WL 3745219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an ALJ’s “determination of a claimant's RFC made without any assessment of RFC by an expert is unsupported by substantial evidence and must be remanded to obtain further functional evidence”
  • holding that an ALJ’s “determination of a claimant’s RFC made without any assessment of RFC by an expert is unsupported by substantial evidence and must be remanded to obtain further functional evidence”
  • An ALJ’s “determination of a claimant’s RFC made without any assessment of a claimant’s RFC by an expert is unsupported by substantial evidence . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.