Beyel Bros., Inc. v. Lemenze

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a motion to interview jurors filed three months after the return of the jury verdict was untimely; citing Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b), which requires a motion for new trial to be served not later than ten days after the return of the jury verdict
• “[T]he filing of the notice of appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction to hear a motion that pertained to the underlying final judgment.”
• \[T]he filing of the notice of appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction to hear a motion that pertained to the underlying final judgment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).