Beyah v. Cartledge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an adverse employment action is required to establish a section 1983 claim based on race discrimination in violation of the equal protection clause
• holding that a race-based § 1983 equal protection claim must allege “a materially adverse employment action”
• holding that the plaintiff successfully pleaded an adverse employment action where the plaintiff alleged facts indicating that his duties were so restricted on the midnight shift that “it is as if he is not a sergeant”
• holding that plaintiff successfully pleaded an adverse employment action based on his assignment to the night shift where plaintiff alleged facts indicating that his duties were so restricted that “it is as if he is not a sergeant”
• concluding that a plaintiff may not assert a claim not alleged in the complaint
• analyzing constitutional race discrimination claim under same standards as Title VII claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).