Bevly v. Tenngasco Gas Gathering Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no proof that right-of-way work “could only have been done at the insistence of Tenngasco’s board”
• no proof that right-of-way work \could only have been done at the insistence of Tenngasco's board\
• no proof that right-of-way work “could only have been done at the insistence of Tenngasco’s board”
• no proof that right-of-way work “could only have been done at the insistence of Tenngasco’s board”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).