Bevins v. Wenerowicz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[N]egligence on the part of a prisoner’s post-conviction counsel does not constitute cause or excuse the procedural default of a claim in state court.”
• “By its own emphatic terms, the Supreme Court’s decision in Martinez is limited to claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel otherwise procedurally barred due to the ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel.”
• “By its own emphatic terms, the Supreme Court’s decision in Martinez is limited to claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel that are otherwise procedurally barred due to the ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).