Bevins v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fraud must be extraneous to the contract rather than a fraudulent nonperformance of the contract itself
• holding that fraud must be extraneous to the contract rather than a fraudulent nonperformance of the contract itself
• “On review, we will make all reasonable inferences in support of the court’s judgment.”
• independent cause of action for fraud must be predicated on fraud that is “extrinsic” to the contract
• “... fraud must be extraneous to the contract, rather than a fraudulent nonperformance of the contract itself.”
• independent cause of action for fraud must be predicated on fraud that is “extrinsic” to the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).