Beville v. Mac K. Falls, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the concept of relevance is broader for discovery purposes than for purposes of the admission of evidence at trial, since it includes not only what is admissible at trial, but also that which leads to what is admissible”
• noting that “the concept of relevance is broader for discovery purposes than for purposes of the admission of evidence at trial, since it includes not only what is admissible at 5 1-16-1918 trial, but also that which leads to what is admissible”
• nonparty nurses and nonparty counsel for defendant hospital appealed contempt order against them for nurses’ refusal to answer questions at depositions per counsel’s instructions
• nonparty nurses and nonparty counsel for defendant hospital appealed contempt order against them for nurses’ refusal to answer questions at depositions per -8- counsel’s instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).