Beverly Anderson v. Dassault Aviation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts need not pierce the corporate veil to consider activities of a subsidiary company in evaluating personal jurisdiction over the parent company
• holding that whether the parent and subsidiary “have a close, synergistic relationship . . . is clearly relevant to the jurisdictional question,” even when that relationship “is not an abuse of the corporate organizational form”
• personal jurisdiction established via parent company’s own contacts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).